Greece Has Defaulted - Which Country In Europe Is Next?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc45a/dc45ad9fef40354374af68d053890ef4035e801a" alt="Greece Has Defaulted - Which Country In Europe Is Next"
Not So Fast On That Whole Economic Recovery Thing
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f9a5/6f9a5a92c06ed80cb8dd8ebd18b73046898c889d" alt="Not So Fast On That Whole Economic Recovery Thing"
President Karzai and the 'secondary' sex
By Rachel Reid
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ae172/ae1729fa7a406f6c5b626c23363ea61a9a2135f3" alt=""
Reflections on Richard Cravatts’ “Genocidal Liberalism: The University’s Jihad Against Israel & Jews”
by David Solway
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/596ba/596bab6cf494d3af16227df846ab2a4af20c938e" alt="genlib"
Editor’s note: The review below is written by David Solway on Dr. Richard Cravatts’ new book, Genocidal Liberalism: The University’s Jihad Against Israel & Jews, published by the David Horowitz Freedom Center. To order a copy, click here. I first came across Richard Cravatts in an article he wrote for Pajamas Media on November 19, 2010, describing York University in Toronto as “a cesspool of anti-Semitic, pro-Palestinian activism.” York is notorious in Canada as one of its most prominent Jew-bashing institutions, taking its cue from larger and more prestigious universities like UC Irvine and Berkeley that promote, in Cravatts’ words, “slanted scholarship for jihad.” Genocidal Liberalism expands Cravatts’ investigative sweep to encompass the entire malign phenomenon of antisemitism cum anti-Zionism that has corrupted the moral integrity and academic rectitude of the American liberal professoriate.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/596ba/596bab6cf494d3af16227df846ab2a4af20c938e" alt="genlib"
Editor’s note: The review below is written by David Solway on Dr. Richard Cravatts’ new book, Genocidal Liberalism: The University’s Jihad Against Israel & Jews, published by the David Horowitz Freedom Center. To order a copy, click here. I first came across Richard Cravatts in an article he wrote for Pajamas Media on November 19, 2010, describing York University in Toronto as “a cesspool of anti-Semitic, pro-Palestinian activism.” York is notorious in Canada as one of its most prominent Jew-bashing institutions, taking its cue from larger and more prestigious universities like UC Irvine and Berkeley that promote, in Cravatts’ words, “slanted scholarship for jihad.” Genocidal Liberalism expands Cravatts’ investigative sweep to encompass the entire malign phenomenon of antisemitism cum anti-Zionism that has corrupted the moral integrity and academic rectitude of the American liberal professoriate.
Solyndra Syndrome Spreads
by Michelle Malkin
There’s
no escaping Solyndra Syndrome. Here in my home state of Colorado,
citizen journalists have uncovered our own gaping government green loan
sinkhole. The stench of Chicago-on-the-Potomac is fouling the fresh
Rocky Mountain air.
Meet Loveland-based Abound Solar, the lucky winner of a $400 million federal loan guarantee from the Obama administration. Earlier this month, the thin-film cadmium telluride solar module-maker announced layoffs of nearly 300 employees (70 percent of its workforce). In addition, the firm froze plans to build a new factory in Indiana. Abound says it will ride out bad market conditions and “hopefully” survive until the market recovers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e9572/e95727dfdd1e148187ebf4be352cf78ff66fb324" alt="solyndra"
Meet Loveland-based Abound Solar, the lucky winner of a $400 million federal loan guarantee from the Obama administration. Earlier this month, the thin-film cadmium telluride solar module-maker announced layoffs of nearly 300 employees (70 percent of its workforce). In addition, the firm froze plans to build a new factory in Indiana. Abound says it will ride out bad market conditions and “hopefully” survive until the market recovers.
The Racist Ravings of Derrick Bell
by John Perazzo
By now, you may already have seen the 1991 video footage of Barack Obama, who was then a 30-year-old student at Harvard Law School, speaking in glowing terms about Harvard professor Derrick Bell,
whom Obama described as a man known for “speaking the truth” and for an
“excellence of … scholarship” that had not only “opened up new vistas
and new horizons,” but had “changed the standards [of what] legal
writing is about.” “Open up your hearts and your minds to the words of
Professor Derrick Bell,” Obama urged the sizable crowd which had
gathered to show their support for Professor Bell that day.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f274f/f274fc1df727613b906b6d8833cd3b51faeb971c" alt="Picture-4"
Sandra Fluke and the Failure of Feminism
Posted by Jacob Laksin and Nichole Hungerford
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/354a9/354a90d9ac36913cfbdf450c3f63e5c6d5e1d82d" alt="139599644.jpg.CROP.rectangle3-large"
By now, you are no doubt familiar with the tearful tale of Sandra Fluke, the Georgetown University Law School student who gained national attention and iconic feminist status last week for publicly protesting the fact that her school’s heath insurance policy does not cover her contraception. Firmly grasping the mantle of victimhood, Fluke lamented that “forty percent” of female students at Georgetown Law “struggl[ed] financially as a result of this policy.” Fluke’s complaint earned her deserved mockery, most prominently from radio host Rush Limbaugh, who riffed that she was essentially asking to be paid for having sex, behavior that he likened to a “slut” and a “prostitute.” That in turn triggered howls of exaggerated outrage from feminists and the left, most prominently President Obama, who personally called Fluke to offer his support and to say that her parents should be proud of her.
Roosevelt’s “Four Freedoms” Fraud
by
James Bovard
President Obama has succeeded in seizing new power over health care and
other swaths of American lives in part because previous presidents
muddied Americans’ understanding of freedom.
Most of the past century’s debates over the meaning of liberty have
featured one politician after another who promised people true freedom,
if only they would submit to increased government power. In the process,
politicians have been generously shrinking people’s individual liberty.
Thank Goodness for WikiLeaks
In October WikiLeaks released close to 400,000 U.S. classified military
documents relating to the Iraq war. The American people, the theoretical
masters of the government, were not supposed to see them. The
government preferred that they not know. So just as when the website
released 77,000 documents on the Afghan war in August, government
officials and apologists for the empire’s war policies roundly condemned
WikiLeaks. Apparently, the greatest breach of decorum is to let the
American people know how their government conducts its wars. In November
WikiLeaks began to release more than 250,000 secret diplomatic cables,
creating even more heat for the organization.
Libertarianism versus Statism
All of us have been born and raised within a statist box, one in which
the federal government’s primary roles are to take care of people,
regulate their economic activities, and maintain an overseas military
empire that intervenes in the affairs of other countries.
Both liberals and conservatives have come to accept this statist box as a permanent feature of American life. Even worse, they have convinced themselves that life in this statist box is actually freedom.
What makes libertarians different from liberals and conservatives is that, although we too have been born and raised within the statist box, we have broken free of it, in an intellectual and moral sense. Moreover, unlike liberals and conservatives, we recognize that statism isn’t freedom at all. It’s the opposite of freedom. Genuine freedom, libertarians contend, entails a dismantling of the statist box in which we all live.
Both liberals and conservatives have come to accept this statist box as a permanent feature of American life. Even worse, they have convinced themselves that life in this statist box is actually freedom.
What makes libertarians different from liberals and conservatives is that, although we too have been born and raised within the statist box, we have broken free of it, in an intellectual and moral sense. Moreover, unlike liberals and conservatives, we recognize that statism isn’t freedom at all. It’s the opposite of freedom. Genuine freedom, libertarians contend, entails a dismantling of the statist box in which we all live.
The Persecution of Lynne Stewart
by Jacob G. Hornberger
Today’s Los Angeles Times has an interesting editorial on the Lynne Stewart case. Stewart is a 72-year-old criminal defense lawyer from New York who is now serving a 10-year sentence in a federal penitentiary. She was convicted in 2005 of supporting terrorism, an offense that arose during her defense of Omar Abdel Rahman, a radical Islamic cleric known as the “blind sheik.”
The Times’ editorial addressed the length of Stewart’s sentence. She was originally sentenced to a term of 28 months. The government appealed that sentence, however, claiming that it was too short, saying that Stewart should have received a higher sentence for three reasons: (1) that she supposedly committed perjury when she testified at trial; (2) that she abused her role as an attorney; and (3) that she wasn’t remorseful for what she had done.
The 'Fairness' Fraud
By
Thomas Sowell
During a recent Fox News Channel debate about the Obama administration's tax policies, Democrat Bob Beckel raised the issue of "fairness."
|
During a recent Fox News Channel debate about the Obama administration's tax policies, Democrat Bob Beckel raised the issue of "fairness."
He pointed out that a child born to a poor woman in the Bronx enters
the world with far worse prospects than a child born to an affluent
couple in Connecticut.
No one can deny that. The relevant question, however, is: How does allowing politicians to take more money in taxes from successful people, to squander in ways that will improve their own reelection prospects, make anything more "fair" for others?
No one can deny that. The relevant question, however, is: How does allowing politicians to take more money in taxes from successful people, to squander in ways that will improve their own reelection prospects, make anything more "fair" for others?
RUSH LIMBAUGH IS DIFFERNET
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/475af/475af179da5249f9fd35db25cbf3caf04af78668" alt="Sometimes a cigar is a subsitute penis."
White House Attack Dog Targets Limbaugh Sponsors
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b0fb/2b0fb2338534b5adb66c7d426b2a084fc4d95feb" alt="WASHINGTON,DC - NOVEMBER 23: David Brock, a former conservative, is the founder of the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America. Media..."
WASHINGTON,DC
- NOVEMBER 23: David Brock, a former conservative, is the founder of
the liberal media watchdog group Media Matters for America. Media... View Enlarged Image
The group Media Matters acts like a lobbyist but is not registered as one. It operates in the shadows, outside congressional oversight and unaccountable to voters.
This makes its collusion with the White House in the heat of a presidential race a serious matter worthy of investigation.
Targeting Limbaugh, a staunch Republican, is no coincidence. If the Obama campaign can silence him, it can knock out the party's most powerful voice for firing up its base and getting out the vote. Limbaugh has a huge Tea Party following.
The White House's attack dog, Media Matters, has been intimidating private businesses into dropping their ads on Limbaugh's popular radio show. It boasts of scaring off 45 of his advertisers since launching its drive last week, when Limbaugh apologized for using sexist terms to criticize a college coed called by Democrats to testify in support of ObamaCare's coverage of birth control.
Media Matters keeps a death watch on its website. It lists those Limbaugh advertisers who have canceled, then identifies sponsors still airing ads — making it clear to Occupy Wall Street and Acorn thugs which business they still need to threaten.
Income Inequality Myths Of Left Exposed Once Again
Economy: The president's strategy this election year is to
divide the supposedly battered 99% from the evil, super-rich 1% doing
the battering. But reports of America's income inequality are greatly
exaggerated.
That financial "inequality" gets treated as a serious issue is proof of an epidemic of economic illiteracy, since the rich do the job-generating in our economy. Now, Manhattan Institute senior fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth has just added some essential new analysis exposing class-warfare fallacies.
Examining Labor Department data, "The Myth of Increasing Income Inequality," published this week, show "that inequality as measured by per-capita spending is no greater today than in it was in the 1980s."
Among the neglected or ignored factors she addresses are the role food stamps, Medicaid and housing allowances play in the statistics; the increase in both high-income two-earner households and low-income one-person households; and more small businesses shifting from corporate to individual tax schedules since the 1986 tax reform.
That financial "inequality" gets treated as a serious issue is proof of an epidemic of economic illiteracy, since the rich do the job-generating in our economy. Now, Manhattan Institute senior fellow Diana Furchtgott-Roth has just added some essential new analysis exposing class-warfare fallacies.
Examining Labor Department data, "The Myth of Increasing Income Inequality," published this week, show "that inequality as measured by per-capita spending is no greater today than in it was in the 1980s."
Among the neglected or ignored factors she addresses are the role food stamps, Medicaid and housing allowances play in the statistics; the increase in both high-income two-earner households and low-income one-person households; and more small businesses shifting from corporate to individual tax schedules since the 1986 tax reform.
Obama Vs. Israel: Priority No. 1? Stop Israel
By CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5525c/5525c2b503e40217c4a66ac9717d4be051c00b25" alt=""
This, 14 months after the last group-of-six negotiations collapsed in Istanbul because of blatant Iranian stalling and unseriousness. Nonetheless, the new negotiations will be both without precondition and preceded by yet more talks to decide such trivialities as venue.
These negotiations don't just gain time for a nuclear program about whose military intent the IAEA is issuing alarming warnings. They make it extremely difficult for Israel to do anything about it (while it still can), lest Israel be universally condemned for having aborted a diplomatic solution.
Only one Republican has made Obama squirm
By Dr. Milton R. Wolf
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73cd7/73cd7122caf0c016f3fd99484615ea8cc2385a56" alt="Illustration by Linas Garsys for The Washington Times"
The FBI, The CIA, Homeland Security, The Federal Reserve And Potential Employers Are All Monitoring You On Facebook And Twitter
The American Dream
Why is there such a sudden obsession with monitoring what average Americans are saying on Facebook and Twitter? To be honest, the vast majority of what is being said on Facebook and Twitter is simply not worth reading even if you could understand it. But for the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Reserve, Facebook and Twitter represent a treasure trove of intelligence information. Tens of millions of us have compiled incredibly detailed dossiers on ourselves and have put them out there for the entire world to see. Since the information is public, the various alphabet agencies of the federal government see no problem with scooping up all of that information and using it for their own purposes. Many potential employers have also discovered that Facebook and Twitter can tell them an awful lot about potential employees. Social media creates a permanent record that reflects who you are and what you believe, and many Americans are finding out that all of this information can come back and haunt them in a big way. In the world in which we now live, privacy is becoming a thing of the past, and we all need to be mindful of the things that we are exposing to the public.
Why is there such a sudden obsession with monitoring what average Americans are saying on Facebook and Twitter? To be honest, the vast majority of what is being said on Facebook and Twitter is simply not worth reading even if you could understand it. But for the FBI, the CIA, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Reserve, Facebook and Twitter represent a treasure trove of intelligence information. Tens of millions of us have compiled incredibly detailed dossiers on ourselves and have put them out there for the entire world to see. Since the information is public, the various alphabet agencies of the federal government see no problem with scooping up all of that information and using it for their own purposes. Many potential employers have also discovered that Facebook and Twitter can tell them an awful lot about potential employees. Social media creates a permanent record that reflects who you are and what you believe, and many Americans are finding out that all of this information can come back and haunt them in a big way. In the world in which we now live, privacy is becoming a thing of the past, and we all need to be mindful of the things that we are exposing to the public.
Pentagon Launches Desperate Damage Control Over Shocking Panetta Testimony
The United States has ceded control of its affairs to international bureaucrats
Paul Joseph Watson
Alex Jones: “This represents absolute 100 per cent proof that the military industrial complex which runs the United States is under the control of foreign central banks who are imposing a military dictatorship.”
The Pentagon is engaging in damage control after shocking testimony yesterday by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta at a Senate Armed Services Committee congressional hearing during which it was confirmed that the U.S. government is now completely beholden to international power structures and that the legislative branch is a worthless relic.
Paul Joseph Watson
Alex Jones: “This represents absolute 100 per cent proof that the military industrial complex which runs the United States is under the control of foreign central banks who are imposing a military dictatorship.”
The Pentagon is engaging in damage control after shocking testimony yesterday by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta at a Senate Armed Services Committee congressional hearing during which it was confirmed that the U.S. government is now completely beholden to international power structures and that the legislative branch is a worthless relic.
Smith & Wesson Reports Surging Gun Purchases On Back of Fears Over Obama Re-Election
60 per cent hike in backlog orders as gun stores report record monthly sales
Paul Joseph Watson
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a18fb/a18fbaa13c6b7f90925dc792f802af9dbf84a6d3" alt="Smith & Wesson Reports Surging Gun Purchases On Back of Fears Over Obama Re Election Photo Smith & Wesson Reports Surging Gun Purchases On Back of Fears Over Obama Re Election"
Paul Joseph Watson
Prolonged economic uncertainty is not proving too much
of a challenge for firearms makers like Smith & Wesson, whose shares
today soared 18 per cent after the company announced a 60 per cent
surge in backlog orders, demand driven by a prevailing belief that
Barack Obama will launch a crackdown on the second amendment if he wins a
second term in the White House.
“Shares in Smith & Wesson Holding Corp (SWHC.O) shot
up nearly 18 percent to their highest in more than two years on Friday,
after the gun maker hiked its full-year sales forecast on a higher
order backlog, reflecting strong demand for its guns and rifles,” reports Reuters.
The Rise of Imperialism in Virginia
by Murray N. Rothbard
The other major factor in the survival of the colony was the discovery by John Rolfe, about 1612, that Virginia tobacco could be grown in such a way as to make it acceptable to European tastes. Previously, Virginia tobacco had been regarded as inferior to the product that had been introduced to the Old World by the Spanish colonies in America. By 1614 Rolfe was able to ship a cargo of tobacco to London and meet a successful market. Very rapidly, Virginia possessed a staple and an important economic base; tobacco could be readily exported to Europe and exchanged for other goods needed by the colonists.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/915a8/915a8127dff07641e8f0eed3958c764c9b3c6c2e" alt=""
[Conceived in Liberty (1975)]
The survival of the Virginia colony hung for years by a hairbreadth.
One major reason for the survival of this distressed colony was the
changes that the Virginia Company agreed to make in its social structure.The other major factor in the survival of the colony was the discovery by John Rolfe, about 1612, that Virginia tobacco could be grown in such a way as to make it acceptable to European tastes. Previously, Virginia tobacco had been regarded as inferior to the product that had been introduced to the Old World by the Spanish colonies in America. By 1614 Rolfe was able to ship a cargo of tobacco to London and meet a successful market. Very rapidly, Virginia possessed a staple and an important economic base; tobacco could be readily exported to Europe and exchanged for other goods needed by the colonists.
Teaching Tomorrow's Economists
by Robert P. Murphy
I am happy to announce that the Teacher's Manual is now available for my introductory textbook, Lessons for the Young Economist.
For those readers who are unfamiliar with it, let me explain that the
student text was designed with junior-high students in mind, but it is
applicable for younger, precocious students, and also even for adults
who never got a solid grounding in free-market economic principles.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/181e6/181e6015d26219beb1802633017a18ea94469e4d" alt=""
U.S. Set to Reach Another Debt Milestone Under Obama – by Jim Geraghty
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ae57/6ae5705878984f2f5e4d8efbab0f2cb672cbf9d8" alt=""
On Tuesday, according to the Department of the Treasury, it was $15,499,023,629,682.44, to be precise.
That figure was $10.6 trillion the day Barack Obama took office.
US: Derrick Bell: The Jeremiah Wright Of Harvard – Investors.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5024d/5024d39ac1c7e17e7656262e265551d0a4f2b0a1" alt=""
It turns out his favorite law professor was the late Derrick Bell, a black radical who taught classes trashing the Constitution as racist.
US: Race-baiting Democrats do nothing for undocumented citizens – by Deroy Murdock
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6431d/6431d4f5553eeb801a8a66963ed33a8b4148c106" alt=""
US: Iran and Obama – by Thomas Sowell
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1709/f1709564d5deb613b5e2444801d6e5c99b2bdbcf" alt=""
What are we to make of President Barack Obama’s latest pronouncements about Iran’s movement toward nuclear bombs? His tough talk might have had some influence on Iran a couple of years ago, when he was instead being kinder and gentler with the world’s leading terrorist-sponsoring nation. Now his tough talk may only influence this year’s election — which may be enough for Obama.
Syria: What Prevents U.S. Military Involvement
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b82b/1b82bf58efe49240bd3b3b31ebe875eec410b36f" alt=""
Alex Wong/Getty Images
U.S. Central Command Commander Gen. James Mattis
The United States is not eager to launch an air campaign against the Syrian regime that would be similar to the NATO campaign in Libya even though numerous U.S. lawmakers have called for such a campaign. Not only did Libya not have the formidable air defense systems that Russia has provided to Syria, but Syria's rebels have not been able to control large areas of territory. These factors would complicate any air campaign against the al Assad regime, but Washington's reluctance to get involved militarily is based on the fear that it could slip into a much messier conflict than it did in Libya.
Spring Break in Mexico: Travel and Security Risks
Spring Break in Mexico: Travel and Security Risks
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4003f/4003f4b87e8bd97c2ae592cf5069e7b52da961c3" alt=""
Russia: Putin To Appoint Medvedev Prime Minister
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d60b4/d60b4f3aad112644e45d68d0ee5eb45c41df66df" alt=""
NATALIA KOLESNIKOVA/AFP/Getty Images
Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin (L) and President Dmitri Medvedev in Moscow on Feb. 23
The premiership's responsibilities and power have shifted over the years. Russia's prime minister oversees the organization of the teams that will address political, economic and security issues and is meant to balance the competing agendas of the Kremlin's political clans.
15 Potentially Massive Threats to the U.S. Economy Over the Next 12 Months. Economic Collapse Blog
We live in
a world that is becoming increasingly unstable, and the potential
for an event that could cause "sudden change" to the U.S. economy
is greater than ever. There are dozens of potentially massive threats
that could easily push the U.S. economy over the edge during the
next 12 months. A war in the Middle East, a financial collapse in
Europe, a major derivatives crisis or a horrific natural disaster
could all change our economic situation very rapidly. Most of the
time I write about the long-term
economic trends that are slowly but surely ripping the U.S.
economy to pieces, but the truth is that just a single really bad
"black
swan event" over the next 12 months could accelerate our economic
problems dramatically. If oil was cut off from the Middle East or
a really bad natural disaster suddenly destroyed a major U.S. city,
the U.S. economy would be thrown into a state of chaos. Considering
how bad the U.S. economy is
currently performing, it would be easy to see how a major "shock
to the system" could push us into the "next Great Depression" very
easily. Let us hope that none of these things actually happen over
the next 12 months, but let us also understand that we live in a
world that has become extremely chaotic and extremely unstable.
How to Ruin Your Economy and Influence People. by Bill Bonner
We can learn
a lot from the Argentines. When it comes to messing up an economy,
they’re Numero Uno. They’re Olympians of financial legerdemain
and masters of the old false shuffle.
In 2001, the
country was deeply in debt. The government was out of money. And
the currency was losing value fast. What did the Argentines do?
First, they
broke their promise to investors and savers, cutting the peso loose
from the dollar. Then, they seized control of banks and bank accounts.
People had been saving money in US dollar accounts in order to avoid
problems with the peso. But the Argentine feds forcibly converted
their accounts to pesos, just as the peso was losing 2/3rds of its
value.
The next thing
was to take the reserves in the central bank and use them to pay
current expenses – which caused the head of the bank to resign
in protest.
Will Ron Paul Invite Mitt Romney To Be His Vice President?. by Allan Stevo
Conservative
Americans DO NOT WANT Mitt Romney. That’s pretty darn obvious. He
spends a fortune trying to convince voters, gets a generous amount
of media time to express his message, and still can’t seem to inspire
the Republican base, even when he’s running against the likes of
crooked party hacks Santorum and Gingrich, or against that other
guy – the Congressman from Texas who seldom gets mentioned in the
media. Against opponents like that, the out-of-touch punditry have
long expected that Super Tuesday 2012 would be the coronation of
Mitt Romney.
How Ron Paul Carried My County … and the man whose selfless work made it possible. by Christopher Manion
Four years
ago and more, I met a neighbor at our farm gate. He was an LRC
regular and wanted to say hello – and to post a big 3’x6’ "Ron
Paul Revolution" sign on our farm fence.
As he drove
up, I smiled at his license plate – "Wrench 1." He got
out the sign, unrolled it, and we talked while we put it up.
"How
long have you been interested in politics," I asked.
"About
two months."
"What
got you hooked?"
"I was
driving to work one morning and saw a sign at the side of the
highway, ‘Google Ron Paul.’ I went home that night and looked
him up."
"I haven’t
sat down since."
That’s how
I met Richard Conrow, a living tribute to the passion for liberty
that God has planted in every man, woman, and child ever born.
While Rockefeller Romney has placed paid campaign staff in virtually
every county in the country – and there are some 3,300 of them
– for the past five years, Ron Paul’s simple appeal to "life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" has inspired countless
lovers of liberty to devote millions of unpaid hours to spread
the word that freedom isn’t dead, and it need not die.
Richard came
back last spring and we went to work again at the farm gate. I
asked him if he’d be so kind as to write down his story – why
a guy who had seldom been interested in politics had suddenly
become an engine of inspiration out here in the Shenandoah Valley.
With his permission, I am quoting here his reply.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e86c4/e86c46c993509563b77ded9d3614f40d462ae2a5" alt=""
Tea Party Knocks off Another GOP Incumbent
by Mike Flynn
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abb71/abb7147adaa7f97b53716e3a0332e4ff7b9fe578" alt=""
For the past several months, the media and the left have continually heralded the "death" of the tea party movement. With a sparkle in their eye and a barely concealed hint of glee, they've reassured themselves that the organic grass-roots movement, which had delivered historic Democrat losses across the country, was fading and would no longer pose a threat to their progressive agenda. Apparently, though, nobody bothered to tell the tea party.
Bell, Farrakhan BFFs
by Ben Shapiro
No comments:
Post a Comment